Warning: This tool or project is no longer maintained and kept available only for archival purposes. Since GoodRelations and schema.org have evolved significantly in the past years, the current status available on this page is unlikely to function as expected. We take no responsibility for any damage caused by the use of this outdated work, to the extent legally possible.

Due to a lack of resources, we are unable to provide support for this project outside of consulting projects or sponsored research. Please contact us if you can contribute resources to update and enhance these resources.

GoodRelations - The Web Vocabulary for E-Commerce

This is the archive of the goodrelations dicussion list

GoodRelations is a standardized vocabulary for product, price, and company data that can (1) be embedded into existing static and dynamic Web pages and that (2) can be processed by other computers. This increases the visibility of your products and services in the latest generation of search engines, recommender systems, and other novel applications.

[goodrelations] GoodRelations and TIWAN ontology

Martin Hepp (UniBW) martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org
Wed Jun 24 00:55:52 CEST 2009


Hi Sherman:
Thanks - Briefly: I think we should integrate the efforts. Basically, it 
is simple to model wants and needs in GoodRelations. You just use a 
gr:Offering with the gr:BusinessFunction gr:Sell - this goes with the 
batteries supplied in the current version of GoodRelations (even though 
I never thought of this application before).

Example: I am interested in buying one TV set with a screen size of at 
least 30 centimeters, and i am not interested in offers more expensive 
than 200 euros:

foo refers to the namespace of the example
pcs refers to the namespace of a fictuous ontology for product types and 
features (e.g. eclassOWL or others)

foo:martinhepp
    a gr:BusinessEntity;
    gr:offers foo:myWant1.

foo:myWant1
      a gr:Offering ;
      gr:hasBusinessFunction gr:Buy;
      gr:hasPriceSpecification foo:UnitPriceSpecification_1 ;
      gr:includesObject foo:TypeAndQuantityNode_1 .

foo:myDreamTVSet
      a pcs:TVSet , gr:ProductOrServiceSomeInstancesPlaceholder;
      pcs:hasScreenSize foo:QuantitativeValueFloat_1.

foo:QuantitativeValueFloat_1
      a gr:QuantitativeValueFloat ;
      gr:hasUnitOfMeasurement "CMT"^^xsd:string ;
      gr:hasMinValueFloat "30.0"^^xsd:float .

foo:TypeAndQuantityNode_1
      a gr:TypeAndQuantityNode ;
      gr:amountOfThisGood "1.0"^^xsd:float ;
      gr:hasUnitOfMeasurement "C62"@en ;
      gr:typeOfGood foo:myDreamTVSet .

foo:UnitPriceSpecification_1
      a gr:UnitPriceSpecification ;
      gr:hasCurrency "EUR"^^xsd:string ;
      gr:hasMaxCurrencyValue "200.0"^^xsd:float ;
      gr:hasUnitOfMeasurement "C62"^^xsd:string .


In order to make this a bit more beautiful an powerful, I could 
introduce a new objectproperty "seeks" that is used instead of "offers" 
to link between a business entity and an offering.


That would be a minimal change to the vocabulary but would allow to 
reverse all BusinessFunctions (e.g. seeks maintance, seeks disposal, etc."

What do you think?

Best
Martin




Sherman Monroe wrote:
> Hi All,
> I've considering the GoodRelations ontology for overdogg.com wants and
> needs. Looking at the GR spec [1], I am not able to see anything classes or
> properties for describing wants/needs. I created the Things You Want and
> Need (TIWAN) ontology[2] to model wants/needs as well as reverse
> auction-style marketplace. I would like to know if a merge between the two
> would be something that you would be interested in. I can definitely see
> where GR plugs into TIWAN, e.g. to describe providers/suppliers. Is
> wants/needs within the scope of GR, or should I continue using TIWAN with
> tie-ins to GR?
>
> [1] http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1#
> [2] http://overdogg.com/ontology/tiwan/
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> goodrelations mailing list
> goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org
> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations
>   

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  mhepp at computer.org
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp

Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================

Webcast:
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/

Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: 
"Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology"
http://tinyurl.com/semtech-hepp

Tool for registering your business:
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/

Overview article on Semantic Universe:
http://tinyurl.com/goodrelations-universe

Project page and resources for developers:
http://purl.org/goodrelations/

Tutorial materials:
Tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey

http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations_Tutorial_ESWC2009




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ebusiness-unibw.org/pipermail/goodrelations/attachments/20090624/fb8f141e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ebusiness-unibw.org/pipermail/goodrelations/attachments/20090624/fb8f141e/attachment.vcf>


More information about the goodrelations mailing list