From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Wed May 6 11:46:54 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 11:46:54 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] GoodRelations Service Update 2009-05-05
Pre-Announcement
Message-ID: <4A015C8E.7000304@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Dear all:
In the past weeks, we received a lot of valuable suggestions on how to
improve the GoodRelations vocabulary. We tried to address all issues.
Attached, please find the change log. A pre-release will be available
later today.
In case any of the proposed changes would cause unwanted side-effects in
your applications, please inform me at your earliest convenience.
The most important and the only potentially incompatible changes are that
- gr:description is now deprecated; we suggest using rdfs:comment instead
- gr:isListPrice is now deprecated and replaced by the more powerful
gr:priceType property
The rest are vocabulary extensions or improvements that help increase
the compatibility with Semantic Web applications.
Best
Martin
2009-05-05 Change Log
=================
- removed p1 namespace prefix (unused)
- added rdfs:label properties for all elements. For reasons of
consistency, they are identical with the element identifiers (e.g.
"BusinessEntity"). Ontologically significant individuals (e.g. days of
the week) also contain the name of their superclass in parentheses (e.g.
"Friday (DayOfWeek)").
- removed unused protege namespace prefix
- Expanded the descriptions of hasMaxValue and hasMinValue to indicate that
hasMaxValueFloat/hasMaxValueInteger,
haxMinValueFloat/hasMinValueInteger, or hasValueFloat/hasValueInteger
should be used when when specifying values.
- set gr:description to deprecated; use rdfs:comment now instead. This
provides better tooling support.
- Added PayPal as a PaymentMethod.
- Added DeliveryModePickUp as a DeliveryMethod
- Added DeliveryModeFreight as a DeliveryMethod
- Added DeliveryModeOwnFleet as a DeliveryMethod
- Added PublicHolidays as a DayOfWeek; This is a placeholder for all
official public holidays at the LocationOfSalesOrServiceProvisioning. It
allows specifying the opening hours on public holidays. If a given day
is a public holiday, this specification supersedes the opening hours for
the respective day of the week.
- Added gr:hasPOS ObjectProperty. This property states that the
respective LocationOfSalesOrServiceProvisioning is a point of sale for
the respective BusinessEntity. It allows linking those two types of
entities without the need for a particular Offering.
- Added VersionInfo property
- Added terms:license statement http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
- Added rdfs:isDefinedBy statements to all elements
- Added LINK tag to XHTML document header,
- Added note that the return format of the ontology specification is
determined by content negotiation - in order to get a particular format,
append .owl or .html to the ontology URI.
- Added hasNAICS datatype property for attaching NAICS codes to
BusinessEntities
- Addes hasISICv4 datatype property for attaching ISIC Rev. 4 codes to
BusinessEntities.
- Added cardinality recommendations (constraints) to datatype and object
properties by extending the rdfs:label elements.
- Added isVariantOf object property for modeling product model variants.
This states that a particular ProductOrServiceModel instance is a
variant of another ProductOrServiceModel. It is pretty safe to infer
that the variant inherits all quantitativeProductOrServiceProperties,
qualitativeProductOrServiceProperties, and
datatypeProductOrServiceProperties that are defined for the first
ProductOrServiceModel.
Example:
foo:Red_Ford_T_Model gr:isVariantOf foo:Ford_T_Model
- Set isListPrice to DEPRECATED.
This boolean attribute indicates whether a UnitPriceSpecification is a
list price (usually a vendor recommendation) or not. TRUE indicates it
is a list price, FALSE indicates it is not. It is safe to assume by
default that a UnitPriceSpecification that lacks this attributes is not
list price.
DEPRECATED. Use gr:priceType property instead.
- Added new datatype property priceType: This attribute can be used to
distinguish multiple different PriceSpecifications for the same Product
or Service. It supersedes the former isListPrice property. The following
values are recommended:
SRP: "suggested retail price" - applicable for all sorts of a
non-binding retail price recommendations, e.g. such published by the
manufacturer or the distributor. This value replaces the former
gr:isListPrice property.
INVOICE: The invoice price, mostly used in the car industry - this is
the price a dealer pays to the manufacturer, excluding rebates and charges.
- Added explicit namespace prefix in addition to the default:
xmlns:gr="http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#"
This may make life easier for ontologies that import GoodRelations.
Note: Proteg? deletes this statement when you open and save the ontology
file.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com Thu May 7 10:27:55 2009
From: nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com (Nicolas Raoul)
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 17:27:55 +0900
Subject: [goodrelations] Repository of businesses?
Message-ID:
Hello all,
Is there a repository of business descriptions?
Something like a triplestore with a SPARQL endpoint.
This way, finding an online bicycle shop delivering to Tokyo would be
as simple as a SPARQL query.
Or are business owners supposed to host their RDF/XML file on their web server?
In that case, how to find business?
Sorry if this already exists, I couldn't find it on the website.
Keep up the good work.
Nicolas Raoul.
http://nrw.free.fr
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Thu May 7 13:27:22 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 13:27:22 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] Repository of businesses?
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <4A02C59A.6090601@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Hi Nicolas,
we are building one ;-) In the meantime, you can use
http://lod.openlinksw.com/
or
http://sindice.com/
http://sindice.com/search?q=*++%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F1999%2F02%2F22-rdf-syntax-ns%23type%3E+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fgoodrelations%2Fv1%23BusinessEntity%3E&qt=advanced
But I must war you - you are just a few weeks to early. We are
fine-tuning large datasets right now, which will include > 1 Mio
instances. This will take, however, a couple of weeks from now.
So don't be disappointed if as of today, sindice shows just some twenty
businesses. Also, their crawling is incomplete.
Best
Martin
PS: And yes, please create a description for your own business using the
annotator tool - five minutes to mark your claims in the Web of Data ;-)
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Nicolas Raoul wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Is there a repository of business descriptions?
> Something like a triplestore with a SPARQL endpoint.
> This way, finding an online bicycle shop delivering to Tokyo would be
> as simple as a SPARQL query.
> Or are business owners supposed to host their RDF/XML file on their web server?
> In that case, how to find business?
> Sorry if this already exists, I couldn't find it on the website.
>
> Keep up the good work.
> Nicolas Raoul.
> http://nrw.free.fr
>
> _______________________________________________
> goodrelations mailing list
> goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org
> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com Thu May 7 14:01:20 2009
From: nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com (Nicolas Raoul)
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 21:01:20 +0900
Subject: [goodrelations] Repository of businesses?
In-Reply-To: <4A02C59A.6090601@ebusiness-unibw.org>
References:
<4A02C59A.6090601@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Message-ID:
Hallo Martin,
I am now browsing Sindice, and I just found this:
Art
and Streetwear
"Art and Streetwear" is not very understandable for machines, and
that's one of the most important criterion people will search for.
Semantic can bring a lot here.
So how about letting store owner choose terms from DBpedia ? In the
same way http://faviki.com allows users to tag pages with terms coming
from DBpedia. Maybe a selection of Wikipedia categories could cover
enough to represent all businesses.
Same goes for:
DE
Using
would make it more semantic and more mashupable.
Is there any reason to have strings instead ?
vlg
Nicolas.
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Thu May 7 15:19:48 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 15:19:48 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] Repository of businesses?
In-Reply-To:
References:
<4A02C59A.6090601@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Message-ID: <4A02DFF4.9060407@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Hi Nicolas:
Thanks for your feedback!
I. As for the eligible regions: The gr:eligibleRegions property uses the
two-character version of ISO 3166-1 (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2) for regions or
ISO 3166-2 , which breaks down the countries from ISO 3166-1 into
administrative subdivisions.
This is the most widely used and politically consensual standard for
describing geo-political regions.
By referring to standards, we keep the conceptual dynamics from other
domains outside of GoodRelations. Also, it is much easier to export
RDF/XML from existing standards, because ISO-3166 is very widely used.
The full argument is in the GoodRelations Technical report, sections
3.2.2. and 3.4.5., available at
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/GoodRelations-TR-final.pdf
II. As for describing WHAT you are selling, there are multiple options
in GoodRelations:
a) Use a precise products and service ontology like eClassOWL - with
that you can say that you are talking of "galvaninzed bolt"s with a
particular gauge and resistance to corrosion etc.
Pro: Semantically precise, allows for parametric search
Con: Feasible only if your range of products is already classified,
otherwise you must first classify all items manually.
b) Just make each product an instance of gr:ProductOrService (actually:
one of its three subclasses) and describe it in natural language.
Pro: Easy to create, even for less structured sources or special things
Con: Not a lot of semantic (though the meta-data of GoodRelations
provides already a lot of added value - if you know that something is a
gr:ProductOrService, its price is 50$, and its rdfs:comment field
contains the word "Guitar", you have a lot more certainty about whether
this is what you are looking for and regarding its commercial meta-data).
c) Use a proprietary hierarchy and convert that into a products and
services ontology (details are here:
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/documentation/vocabulary-dev).
Pro: Often not a lot of extra effort over b), users have access to the
source hierarchy for navigation and search
Con: Semantic interoperability between multiple hierarchies remains
difficult.
d) Using dbPedia entries - as you can see in the following paper, there
are many striking arguments for that, in particular the broad coverage
(more than 200,000 good categories - 8 times as much as eClassOWL contains).
Hepp, Martin; Siorpaes, Katharina; Bachlechner, Daniel: Harvesting Wiki
Consensus: Using Wikipedia Entries as Vocabulary for Knowledge
Management, IEEE Internet Computing, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 54-65, Sept-Oct
2007.
PDF at
http://www.heppnetz.de/files/hepp-siorpaes-bachlechner-harvesting%20wikipedia%20w5054.pdf
Problems with this approach are that
- it is hard to filter out product categories from other dbPedia URIs
(on the other hand, we could leave that up to human intelligence at the
annotation stage). Also, basically everything that is an object could
serve as a product (someone may offer New York city or the Moon for sale
- legally problematic, but ontology-wise perfectly correct).
- Lack of formal attributes for describing the products in more detail.
- Difficult to implement for exports from Web shop software, since most
businesses have not yet classified their products in terms of dbPedia
URIs. So while ideal for manual descriptions using the GoodRelations
Annotator, it is not perfect for bulk data exports.
- Mapping to industrial classifications, namely eClassOWL is difficult
(same as with c)).
But basically we are in perfect agreement and we are already planning to
add dbPedia URIs as an alternative approach for describing the type of
product or service in more detail.
In the meantime, you can already do so manually by editing the RDF/XML
file an attaching a link to the dbPedia URI of your choice.
foo:myProduct rdf:type gr:ActualProductOrServiceInstance
foo:myProduct rdf:type
However, one must be careful, because the semantics of the dbPedia URI
for types of products is not necessary that of a class of functionally
similar objects. dbPedia URIs can be interpreted both with a "topic"
semantics or with a narrow "class" semantics. If used as a class, does
subsume only actual TV sets or also
user's manuals for TV sets?
But again - we are working on a model for the proper representation.
Best - and thanks for trying and the feedback!
Martin
Nicolas Raoul wrote:
> Hallo Martin,
>
> I am now browsing Sindice, and I just found this:
> Art
> and Streetwear
>
> "Art and Streetwear" is not very understandable for machines, and
> that's one of the most important criterion people will search for.
> Semantic can bring a lot here.
>
> So how about letting store owner choose terms from DBpedia ? In the
> same way http://faviki.com allows users to tag pages with terms coming
> from DBpedia. Maybe a selection of Wikipedia categories could cover
> enough to represent all businesses.
>
> Same goes for:
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">DE
> Using
> would make it more semantic and more mashupable.
>
> Is there any reason to have strings instead ?
>
> vlg
> Nicolas.
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Fri May 8 10:04:07 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 10:04:07 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] =?iso-8859-1?q?Bug_in_Prot=E9g=E9_/_Importing_ont?=
=?iso-8859-1?q?ologies?=
Message-ID: <4A03E777.2010000@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Dear all:
There seems to be a bug in Prot?g? that may cause irritation when
importing GoodRelations (and other ontologies). The effect is that if
you try to import GoodRelations into a new OWL project using the
official URI "http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1", you will get a Java
exception.
The reason seems to be that Prot?g? does not explicitly request RDF/XML
and then gets XHTML (the documentation).
There is an easy fix to that: Simply use the URI of the GoodRelations
OWL file, i.e.
http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1.owl
(mind the .owl suffix!).
That will do the trick.
The problem is not specific to GoodRelations; we were able to reproduce
it with several other ontologies that use content negotiation. Since the
latter is a standard technique, I assume the problem is of general
relevance.
Attached, please find a few screenshots illustrating the problem.
Best
Martin Hepp
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 10.png
Type: image/png
Size: 52606 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 9.png
Type: image/png
Size: 78695 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 8.png
Type: image/png
Size: 56079 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 7.png
Type: image/png
Size: 46460 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 5.png
Type: image/png
Size: 78502 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Picture 4.png
Type: image/png
Size: 89417 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Wed May 13 12:52:32 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:52:32 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] [Fwd: fw: Google starts supporting RDFa -- 'rich
snippets']
Message-ID: <4A0AA670.8090807@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Dear all:
Great news: Google is now also considering RDFa data! While they are
currently supporting only a very limited set of vocabularies, this opens
up the chance for GoodRelations data to be honored by Google, too!.
Best
Martin
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: fw: Google starts supporting RDFa -- 'rich snippets'
Resent-Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 08:27:30 +0000
Resent-From: public-lod at w3.org
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:27:31 +0200
From: Chris Bizer
To:
Very nice. After Yahoo SearchMonkey has been around for a while, things are
now also moving at Google.
See:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html
And Ivan's comment on it:
http://ivan-herman.name/2009/05/13/rdfa-google/
Cheers,
Chris
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Wed May 20 10:33:30 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 10:33:30 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] ANN: GoodRelations Service Update 2009-05-05 -
Please refresh your caches!
Message-ID: <4A13C05A.1020001@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Dear all:
We just released a service update of the GoodRelations ontology for
e-commerce.
The ontology is available at
http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1
If you want to explicitly fetch the OWL file or the HTML documentation,
you may also use
http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1.owl
or
http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1.html
Please replace all local copies of GoodRelations by this new file.
The service update is designed to be fully backwards-compatible. Only a
few changes may require small modifications of current applications or
data sets. Those few potentially incompatible changes are as follows:
- gr:description is now deprecated; we suggest using rdfs:comment instead.
- gr:isListPrice is now deprecated and replaced by the more powerful
gr:priceType property.
The remaining changes are vocabulary extensions or improvements that
help increase the compatibility with Semantic Web applications. For
example, we
- changed cardinality recommendations for opening hours and business
functions, which simplifies the usage of GoodRelations in RDFa;
- added PayPal as a payment method, and
- added labels to all elements.
A complete change log is at
http://tinyurl.com/q8yln9
A big thank you for the many valuable suggestions for improvement!
Best
Martin
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One
Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and
Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based
E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One
Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and
Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based
E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Wed May 20 10:55:39 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 10:55:39 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] ANN: GoodRelations - E-Commerce on the Web of Data
- New Datasets and Applications
Message-ID: <4A13C58B.7080402@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Dear all:
Thanks to the help of several partners, there are now new data sets and
tools related to the GoodRelations ontology for e-commerce:
*1. OpenEAN data set: 1 million EAN/UPC codes plus respective labels*
The full data set is at
http://openean.kaufkauf.net/id/
Individual commodity descriptions can be retrieved as follows:
http://openean.kaufkauf.net/id/EanUpc_
Example:
http://openean.kaufkauf.net/id/EanUpc_0001067792600
With this data set, Point-of-Sale applications can simply query the
Semantic Web for the proper labels for a given UPC/EAN code. For
example, the proper label for the UPC/EAN code 0001067792600 can be
retrieved as follows:
SELECT ?uri, ?label WHERE {?uri rdf:type
. ?uri
"0001067792600"^^. ?uri
rdfs:label ?label}
Since the data set is already replicated in the Virtuoso LOD data space
(special thanks to Kingsley Idehen from OpenLink Software!), one can
simply query the respective SPARQL endpoint, e.g.:
http://lod.openlinksw.com/sparql?default-graph-uri=&query=SELECT+%3Furi%2C+%3Flabel+WHERE+{%3Furi+rdf%3Atype+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fgoodrelations%2Fv1%23ProductOrServiceModel%3E.+%3Furi+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fgoodrelations%2Fv1%23hasEAN_UCC-13%3E+%220001067792600%22^^%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2001%2FXMLSchema%23string%3E.+%3Furi+rdfs%3Alabel+%3Flabel}&format=text%2Fhtml&debug=on&timeout=
(alternatively, use http://tinyurl.com/qxwrt6)
A big thank you goes to Michael Pfeiffer from Kaufkauf.net
(http://www.kaufkauf.net/index.php?l=en) for providing the data and for
hosting the RDF data set, and to Andreas Radinger and Tobias Ostheim for
the data conversion!
*
2. FreeclassOWL: Products and services ontology for the construction and
building industry
*This ontology defines 4,780 classes, 162 properties, and 1,182
qualitative values for products and services from the construction and
building materials domain. All labels are available in up to EIGHT
languages. FreeclassOWL is compatible with GoodRelations and available
under a Creative Commons 3.0 License.
*Base URI: *
http://www.freeclass.eu/freeclass_v1
*Ontology: *
http://www.freeclass.eu/freeclass_v1.owl
*Documentation:*
http://www.freeclass.eu/freeclass_v1.html
A big thank you goes to Otto Handle from http://www.inndata.at/ for
making their Freeclass classification available for the Web of Data, and
to Andreas Radinger and Tobias Ostheim for the data conversion!
*
3. Extensions / Plug-ins for osCommerce and Joomla/Virtuemart
*There are now working prototypes of export interfaces that allow
creating GoodRelations data directly from popular Web shop or CMS software.
*a) osCommerce Web Shop Software*
http://code.google.com/p/goodrelations-for-oscommerce/
(An alternative export project for osCommerce is at
http://triplify.org/Configuration/osCommerce.)
*b) Joomla/Virtuemart CMS/Shop combo*
http://code.google.com/p/goodrelations-for-joomla/
A big thank you goes to Alex Stolz for his hard work in developing the
two components!
Also, Intershop recently completed an internal feasibility study and
prototype of RDFa and RDF/XML export for their Enfinity series. The
results are unfortunately not yet available to the general public, but
in case you are an Intershop client with Semantic Web interests, it
would not hurt to ask them...
Best wishes
Martin
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Fri May 22 14:59:01 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:59:01 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BFwd=3A_Re=3A_=5BFwd=3A__Bug_in_?=
=?iso-8859-1?q?_____Prot=E9g=E9_/_Importing_ontologies=5D=5D?=
Message-ID: <4A16A195.7050504@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Dear all:
When importing GoodRelations in Protege, you must specify the exact file
location of the ontology, i.e.
http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1.owl
Using the ontology base URI
http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1
does not work and causes an error message.
According to Tania Tudorache, this is not a bug but intended behavior.
Best
Martin Hepp
-------- Original Message -------
This is not a bug. If you import an ontology from a URL, you need to
specify the URL of the owl file. So in case of the GoodRelations
ontology, you need to specify:
http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1.owl
And that works fine in Protege 3.4.
Tania
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com Sat May 23 11:25:06 2009
From: nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com (Nicolas Raoul)
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:25:06 +0900
Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce?
Message-ID:
Dear all,
I want to publish data from Wikitravel.org (like DBpedia does for
Wikipedia) so I need an ontology to describe tourism information
(hotels, restaurants, spots) with details (address, phone, prices,
services, business hours). I was not able to find any, so far.
Am I right that currently GoodRelations is only for e-commerce and
does not apply to such businesses as hotels, restaurants, and
brick-and-mortar shops?
I am sure you have surveyed existing commerce ontologies, so I am
begging for your expertise: what ontologies exist to describe hotels
and restaurants?
Thank you very much,
Nicolas Raoul
http://nrw.free.fr
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Sat May 23 13:46:43 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 13:46:43 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce?
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Hi Nicholas,
Nicolas Raoul wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I want to publish data from Wikitravel.org (like DBpedia does for
> Wikipedia) so I need an ontology to describe tourism information
> (hotels, restaurants, spots) with details (address, phone, prices,
> services, business hours). I was not able to find any, so far.
>
>
> Am I right that currently GoodRelations is only for e-commerce and
> does not apply to such businesses as hotels, restaurants, and
> brick-and-mortar shops?
>
No, GoodRelations can be used (and is intended to be used) for exactly
those scenarios: You can use it to express that you
- rent cars
- sell pizzas (or meals in general)
- sell boats
For brick-and-mortar-businesses, GoodRelations can be used exactly the
same way as for pure online shops.
You can specify opening hours, shop locations (e.g. for restaurant
chains) etc.
For hotels and restaurants: There are specializations based on
GoodRelations for the Austrian e-tourism sector available at
http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/
restaurants:
http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/gastro.owl
accommodations:
http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/acco.owl
But you can basically use either plain GoodRelations or GoodRelations in
combination with a suitable hotel or meals ontology for specifying
touristic offers.
If you have any data samples or, better, real-world data sources, we can
help you with the respective modeling.
As a first starting point, I recommend looking at gr:BusinessFunctions
for Sell and Lease.
Best
Martin
PS: A work-in-progress Web page for the tourism domain is at
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations_Examples#Accommodation_and_Hotel_Rooms
> I am sure you have surveyed existing commerce ontologies, so I am
> begging for your expertise: what ontologies exist to describe hotels
> and restaurants?
>
> Thank you very much,
> Nicolas Raoul
> http://nrw.free.fr
>
> _______________________________________________
> goodrelations mailing list
> goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org
> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Sat May 23 15:08:20 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 15:08:20 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce?
In-Reply-To: <4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org>
References:
<4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Message-ID: <4A17F544.6000005@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Dear Nicolas, all:
Of course, you can also use GoodRelations in combination with eClassOWL
for describing hotels and restaurants:
A good starting point is the tool for creating basic descriptions for
any business at
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
The tool only allows choosing from the first two hierarchy levels of
eClassOWL, but you could replace the class IDs in the RDF/XML later on
in order to make the description more specific.
A restaurant could use the eClassOWL 5.1.4 category 2520 (Food and
services) or one of the following more specific classes:
25-20-01-00 - Restaurant (service), [ eclass:C_AKG508003-gen ]
25-20-01-01 - Restaurant with conventional service (service), [
eclass:C_AKG509003-gen ]
25-20-01-02 - Restaurant with self-service (service), [
eclass:C_AKG510003-gen ]
25-20-01-03 - Cafe (service), 25-20-01-03 [ eclass:C_AKG511003-gen ]
25-20-02-01 - Bar (service), [ eclass:C_AKG515003-gen ]
25-20-02-02 - Bar and entertainment restaurant (service) [
eclass:C_AKG516003-gen ]
25-20-02-03 - Disco and dance restaurant (service) [
eclass:C_AKG517003-gen ]
The proper gr:BusinessFunction would be gr:ProvideService, since eClass
classifies restaurants as types of services. (When using an ontology
that defines particular types of meals, then the proper business
function would be "sell".)
A hotel could use the eClassOWL 5.1.4 category 2512 (Travel Management)
or, better, one of the following more specific classes:
25-12-13-01 - Hotel (travel management), [ eclass:C_AKG314003-gen ]
25-12-13-02 - Hotel garni (travel management), [
eclass:C_AKG315003-gen ]
25-12-13-03 - Inn (travel management),[ eclass:C_AKG316003-gen ]
25-12-13-04 - Pension (travel management), [ eclass:C_AKG317003-gen ]
The proper gr:BusinessFunction would be gr:ProvideService, too.
eclass: = http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/ontologies/eclass/5.1.4/#
Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
>
>
> Nicolas Raoul wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I want to publish data from Wikitravel.org (like DBpedia does for
>> Wikipedia) so I need an ontology to describe tourism information
>> (hotels, restaurants, spots) with details (address, phone, prices,
>> services, business hours). I was not able to find any, so far.
>>
>> Am I right that currently GoodRelations is only for e-commerce and
>> does not apply to such businesses as hotels, restaurants, and
>> brick-and-mortar shops?
>>
> No, GoodRelations can be used (and is intended to be used) for exactly
> those scenarios: You can use it to express that you
>
> - rent cars
> - sell pizzas (or meals in general)
> - sell boats
>
> For brick-and-mortar-businesses, GoodRelations can be used exactly the
> same way as for pure online shops.
>
> You can specify opening hours, shop locations (e.g. for restaurant
> chains) etc.
>
> For hotels and restaurants: There are specializations based on
> GoodRelations for the Austrian e-tourism sector available at
>
> http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/
>
> restaurants:
> http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/gastro.owl
> accommodations:
> http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/acco.owl
>
> But you can basically use either plain GoodRelations or GoodRelations
> in combination with a suitable hotel or meals ontology for specifying
> touristic offers.
>
> If you have any data samples or, better, real-world data sources, we
> can help you with the respective modeling.
>
> As a first starting point, I recommend looking at gr:BusinessFunctions
> for Sell and Lease.
>
> Best
>
> Martin
>
>
> PS: A work-in-progress Web page for the tourism domain is at
>
> http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations_Examples#Accommodation_and_Hotel_Rooms
>
>
>
>
>
>> I am sure you have surveyed existing commerce ontologies, so I am
>> begging for your expertise: what ontologies exist to describe hotels
>> and restaurants?
>>
>> Thank you very much,
>> Nicolas Raoul
>> http://nrw.free.fr
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> goodrelations mailing list
>> goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org
>> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations
>>
>>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com Sat May 23 17:03:45 2009
From: nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com (Nicolas Raoul)
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 00:03:45 +0900
Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce?
In-Reply-To: <4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org>
References:
<4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Message-ID:
Thank you for your answer!
I am glad to know I can use it, I will look into that.
>> ?Am I right that currently GoodRelations is only for e-commerce and
>> does not apply to such businesses as hotels, restaurants, and
>> brick-and-mortar shops?
> No, GoodRelations can be used (and is intended to be used) for exactly those
> scenarios
I am happy but confused. The GoodRelations webpage appears very
misleading to me:
1) Motto is "GoodRelations The ontology for E-Commerce"
2) "the representational means required for e-commerce on the Semantic Web"
3) The general term used for businesses/etc is "Web resources"
4) "describing the types of goods and terms and conditions of items
and services offered on the Web": it is not obvious that "on the Web"
refers to "describing" and not to "offered".
The Semantic Web describes the world. The tiny pub near my place will
probably never do any e-commerce, but I want to describe it in the
Semantic Web. I am glad GoodRelations allows me to do it, but why does
it mentions e-commerce everywhere?
Cheers,
Nicolas.
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Sat May 23 18:41:15 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:41:15 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce?
In-Reply-To:
References: <4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Message-ID: <4A18272B.6070300@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Hi Nicolas:
As soon as any brick-and-mortar business or pub around the corner is
publishing a one-page description of itself on the Web (or even gets
listed in a database-driven Web business registry), this business is
doing e-commerce.
This is the mainstream definition of e-commerce in academia and
practice: Using the Internet (or other open digital networks) for any
stage in the business transaction - from search to transactions. There
are of course different levels of e-commerce, from the the simple
presentation of features to end-to-end transaction processing. But as
soon as your business publishes its range of products or services on the
Web (or even only in the Web of Data), this is e-commerce.
And that is exactly what GoodRelations is designed for: improving search
and data interoperability for any business that is offering anything on
the Web.
Hope that clarifies the issue.
Best
Martin
Nicolas Raoul wrote:
> Thank you for your answer!
> I am glad to know I can use it, I will look into that.
>
>
>>> Am I right that currently GoodRelations is only for e-commerce and
>>> does not apply to such businesses as hotels, restaurants, and
>>> brick-and-mortar shops?
>>>
>> No, GoodRelations can be used (and is intended to be used) for exactly those
>> scenarios
>>
>
> I am happy but confused. The GoodRelations webpage appears very
> misleading to me:
> 1) Motto is "GoodRelations The ontology for E-Commerce"
> 2) "the representational means required for e-commerce on the Semantic Web"
> 3) The general term used for businesses/etc is "Web resources"
> 4) "describing the types of goods and terms and conditions of items
> and services offered on the Web": it is not obvious that "on the Web"
> refers to "describing" and not to "offered".
>
> The Semantic Web describes the world. The tiny pub near my place will
> probably never do any e-commerce, but I want to describe it in the
> Semantic Web. I am glad GoodRelations allows me to do it, but why does
> it mentions e-commerce everywhere?
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolas.
>
> _______________________________________________
> goodrelations mailing list
> goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org
> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com Sun May 24 14:36:08 2009
From: nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com (Nicolas Raoul)
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 21:36:08 +0900
Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce?
In-Reply-To: <4A18272B.6070300@ebusiness-unibw.org>
References:
<4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org>
<4A18272B.6070300@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Message-ID:
Hello Martin,
> As soon as any brick-and-mortar business or pub around the corner is
> publishing a one-page description of itself on the Web (or even gets listed
> in a database-driven Web business registry), this business is doing
> e-commerce.
Thank you for the clarification.
According to this definition, all commerces (nearly) do e-commerce. It
seems quite different from most definitions I can find at
http://www.google.com/search?q=define:e-commerce
Let's say my grand-father's grand-father used to sell sausages in 1875
and I want to describe it in RDF in my library, which is not connected
to the Internet. Was he doing e-commerce?
An ontology for medecine does not call itself an e-medecine ontology.
Similarly, an ontology for commerce would probably be better described
as a commerce ontology than an e-commerce ontology, in my opinion.
I think GoodRelations is a much-needed ontology, I hope it will get
adopted by many. I am just afraid that most people reading the main
page will assume it is for online businesses:
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations
Thanks,
Keep up the good work,
Nicolas Raoul.
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Mon May 25 12:40:21 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:40:21 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] GoodRelations / EAN/UPC
In-Reply-To: <51C090FE-919A-461A-B4AD-6520F4879928@yahoo-inc.com>
References: <49C7D1CE.5090206@yahoo-inc.com>
<4A140572.2010801@ebusiness-unibw.org>
<51C090FE-919A-461A-B4AD-6520F4879928@yahoo-inc.com>
Message-ID: <4A1A7595.7030705@ebusiness-unibw.org>
(including the mailing list in my reply)
Dear Alex:
I see the point - the problem with turning gr:hasEAN_UCC-13 into an
owl:InverseFunctionalProperty is, as far as I can see, that
1. there is no canonical way of deriving a URI or URN from a given
EAN/UCC-13 code. At least, I don't know of any. And unless there is an
authoritative URI for each EAN/UCC-code, you can still not avoid custom
inferencing.
2. There may be unwanted side-effects (even if rare), because the same
gr:ProductModel may have multiple EAN/UCC codes, and, more importantly,
EAN/UCC codes can be attached both to gr:ProductModels and gr:Offerings
(which is based on how EAN/UPC identifiers are used in the value chain -
they can be attached to commodity makes and models and to sales units,
e.g. bunles or variants).
This is why, for the moment, I favor using custom inferencing to link
all records that
1. Are of the same type (e.g. are both gr:ProductOrServices or both
gr:Offerings
AND
2. Have the same EAN/UCC.
Note that two instances x and y whith x being an instance of
gr:ProductOrService and y being and instance of gr:Offering MUST NOT be
merged into one by owl:sameAs or other axioms, because
gr:ProductOrService and gr:Offering are disjoint.
Best
Martin
Alex Cozzi wrote:
> Thanks Martin.
> A question: the gr:hasEAN_UCC-13 is very useful for unifying objects
> across databases, but currently is a datatype property. I was
> wondering whether defining a reverse functional property
> (owl:InverseFunctionalProperty) that points to a URI version of the
> EAN_UCC-13 would be possible/desiderable. I am not sure what is the
> standard uri representation of EAN_UCC-13, but having such property
> would reduce the amount of custom inference needed to unify product
> descriptions. Does it make sense?
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Mon May 25 19:34:30 2009
From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW))
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:34:30 +0200
Subject: [goodrelations] GoodRelations entity types hit ranks #3, #20,
and #46 in popularity on PingTheSemanticWeb
Message-ID: <4A1AD6A6.9030104@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Dear all:
Since our recent new vocabularies and data sets are now properly
included, GoodRelations elements are now among the most popular concepts
on the Web of Data according to PingTheSemanticWeb:
Rank 3: gr:ProductOrServiceModel
Rank 20: gr:BusinessEntity
Rank 46: gr:QualitativeValue
Only the long established FOAF person and document elements are used
more frequently:
Rank 1: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person 19, 002, 417
Rank 2: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Document 4, 793, 253
Additional, more powerful datasets are under to be released shortly.
Note that there is a lot of room for additional growth. There are
actually more than 19 million business entities in Europe alone, which
are perfect candidates for gr:BusinessEntity, and they will each likely
have anything between a few and several thousand instances of
gr:Offering and gr:ProductOrServiceSomeInstacesPlaceholder.
Best
Martin
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: mhepp at computer.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data!
========================================================================
Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce:
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/
Tool for registering your business:
----------------------------------
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/
Overview article on Semantic Universe:
-------------------------------------
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html
Project page and resources for developers:
-----------------------------------------
http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Upcoming events:
---------------
Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70
Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology
http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PTSW-Top10-May 25.png
Type: image/png
Size: 88441 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PTSW-All-May 25.png
Type: image/png
Size: 193551 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: