From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Wed May 6 11:46:54 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 11:46:54 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] GoodRelations Service Update 2009-05-05 Pre-Announcement Message-ID: <4A015C8E.7000304@ebusiness-unibw.org> Dear all: In the past weeks, we received a lot of valuable suggestions on how to improve the GoodRelations vocabulary. We tried to address all issues. Attached, please find the change log. A pre-release will be available later today. In case any of the proposed changes would cause unwanted side-effects in your applications, please inform me at your earliest convenience. The most important and the only potentially incompatible changes are that - gr:description is now deprecated; we suggest using rdfs:comment instead - gr:isListPrice is now deprecated and replaced by the more powerful gr:priceType property The rest are vocabulary extensions or improvements that help increase the compatibility with Semantic Web applications. Best Martin 2009-05-05 Change Log ================= - removed p1 namespace prefix (unused) - added rdfs:label properties for all elements. For reasons of consistency, they are identical with the element identifiers (e.g. "BusinessEntity"). Ontologically significant individuals (e.g. days of the week) also contain the name of their superclass in parentheses (e.g. "Friday (DayOfWeek)"). - removed unused protege namespace prefix - Expanded the descriptions of hasMaxValue and hasMinValue to indicate that hasMaxValueFloat/hasMaxValueInteger, haxMinValueFloat/hasMinValueInteger, or hasValueFloat/hasValueInteger should be used when when specifying values. - set gr:description to deprecated; use rdfs:comment now instead. This provides better tooling support. - Added PayPal as a PaymentMethod. - Added DeliveryModePickUp as a DeliveryMethod - Added DeliveryModeFreight as a DeliveryMethod - Added DeliveryModeOwnFleet as a DeliveryMethod - Added PublicHolidays as a DayOfWeek; This is a placeholder for all official public holidays at the LocationOfSalesOrServiceProvisioning. It allows specifying the opening hours on public holidays. If a given day is a public holiday, this specification supersedes the opening hours for the respective day of the week. - Added gr:hasPOS ObjectProperty. This property states that the respective LocationOfSalesOrServiceProvisioning is a point of sale for the respective BusinessEntity. It allows linking those two types of entities without the need for a particular Offering. - Added VersionInfo property - Added terms:license statement http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ - Added rdfs:isDefinedBy statements to all elements - Added LINK tag to XHTML document header, - Added note that the return format of the ontology specification is determined by content negotiation - in order to get a particular format, append .owl or .html to the ontology URI. - Added hasNAICS datatype property for attaching NAICS codes to BusinessEntities - Addes hasISICv4 datatype property for attaching ISIC Rev. 4 codes to BusinessEntities. - Added cardinality recommendations (constraints) to datatype and object properties by extending the rdfs:label elements. - Added isVariantOf object property for modeling product model variants. This states that a particular ProductOrServiceModel instance is a variant of another ProductOrServiceModel. It is pretty safe to infer that the variant inherits all quantitativeProductOrServiceProperties, qualitativeProductOrServiceProperties, and datatypeProductOrServiceProperties that are defined for the first ProductOrServiceModel. Example: foo:Red_Ford_T_Model gr:isVariantOf foo:Ford_T_Model - Set isListPrice to DEPRECATED. This boolean attribute indicates whether a UnitPriceSpecification is a list price (usually a vendor recommendation) or not. TRUE indicates it is a list price, FALSE indicates it is not. It is safe to assume by default that a UnitPriceSpecification that lacks this attributes is not list price. DEPRECATED. Use gr:priceType property instead. - Added new datatype property priceType: This attribute can be used to distinguish multiple different PriceSpecifications for the same Product or Service. It supersedes the former isListPrice property. The following values are recommended: SRP: "suggested retail price" - applicable for all sorts of a non-binding retail price recommendations, e.g. such published by the manufacturer or the distributor. This value replaces the former gr:isListPrice property. INVOICE: The invoice price, mostly used in the car industry - this is the price a dealer pays to the manufacturer, excluding rebates and charges. - Added explicit namespace prefix in addition to the default: xmlns:gr="http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#" This may make life easier for ontologies that import GoodRelations. Note: Proteg? deletes this statement when you open and save the ontology file. -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com Thu May 7 10:27:55 2009 From: nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com (Nicolas Raoul) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 17:27:55 +0900 Subject: [goodrelations] Repository of businesses? Message-ID: Hello all, Is there a repository of business descriptions? Something like a triplestore with a SPARQL endpoint. This way, finding an online bicycle shop delivering to Tokyo would be as simple as a SPARQL query. Or are business owners supposed to host their RDF/XML file on their web server? In that case, how to find business? Sorry if this already exists, I couldn't find it on the website. Keep up the good work. Nicolas Raoul. http://nrw.free.fr From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Thu May 7 13:27:22 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 13:27:22 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] Repository of businesses? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4A02C59A.6090601@ebusiness-unibw.org> Hi Nicolas, we are building one ;-) In the meantime, you can use http://lod.openlinksw.com/ or http://sindice.com/ http://sindice.com/search?q=*++%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F1999%2F02%2F22-rdf-syntax-ns%23type%3E+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fgoodrelations%2Fv1%23BusinessEntity%3E&qt=advanced But I must war you - you are just a few weeks to early. We are fine-tuning large datasets right now, which will include > 1 Mio instances. This will take, however, a couple of weeks from now. So don't be disappointed if as of today, sindice shows just some twenty businesses. Also, their crawling is incomplete. Best Martin PS: And yes, please create a description for your own business using the annotator tool - five minutes to mark your claims in the Web of Data ;-) http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Nicolas Raoul wrote: > Hello all, > > Is there a repository of business descriptions? > Something like a triplestore with a SPARQL endpoint. > This way, finding an online bicycle shop delivering to Tokyo would be > as simple as a SPARQL query. > Or are business owners supposed to host their RDF/XML file on their web server? > In that case, how to find business? > Sorry if this already exists, I couldn't find it on the website. > > Keep up the good work. > Nicolas Raoul. > http://nrw.free.fr > > _______________________________________________ > goodrelations mailing list > goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org > http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com Thu May 7 14:01:20 2009 From: nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com (Nicolas Raoul) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 21:01:20 +0900 Subject: [goodrelations] Repository of businesses? In-Reply-To: <4A02C59A.6090601@ebusiness-unibw.org> References: <4A02C59A.6090601@ebusiness-unibw.org> Message-ID: Hallo Martin, I am now browsing Sindice, and I just found this: Art and Streetwear "Art and Streetwear" is not very understandable for machines, and that's one of the most important criterion people will search for. Semantic can bring a lot here. So how about letting store owner choose terms from DBpedia ? In the same way http://faviki.com allows users to tag pages with terms coming from DBpedia. Maybe a selection of Wikipedia categories could cover enough to represent all businesses. Same goes for: DE Using would make it more semantic and more mashupable. Is there any reason to have strings instead ? vlg Nicolas. From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Thu May 7 15:19:48 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 15:19:48 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] Repository of businesses? In-Reply-To: References: <4A02C59A.6090601@ebusiness-unibw.org> Message-ID: <4A02DFF4.9060407@ebusiness-unibw.org> Hi Nicolas: Thanks for your feedback! I. As for the eligible regions: The gr:eligibleRegions property uses the two-character version of ISO 3166-1 (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2) for regions or ISO 3166-2 , which breaks down the countries from ISO 3166-1 into administrative subdivisions. This is the most widely used and politically consensual standard for describing geo-political regions. By referring to standards, we keep the conceptual dynamics from other domains outside of GoodRelations. Also, it is much easier to export RDF/XML from existing standards, because ISO-3166 is very widely used. The full argument is in the GoodRelations Technical report, sections 3.2.2. and 3.4.5., available at http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/GoodRelations-TR-final.pdf II. As for describing WHAT you are selling, there are multiple options in GoodRelations: a) Use a precise products and service ontology like eClassOWL - with that you can say that you are talking of "galvaninzed bolt"s with a particular gauge and resistance to corrosion etc. Pro: Semantically precise, allows for parametric search Con: Feasible only if your range of products is already classified, otherwise you must first classify all items manually. b) Just make each product an instance of gr:ProductOrService (actually: one of its three subclasses) and describe it in natural language. Pro: Easy to create, even for less structured sources or special things Con: Not a lot of semantic (though the meta-data of GoodRelations provides already a lot of added value - if you know that something is a gr:ProductOrService, its price is 50$, and its rdfs:comment field contains the word "Guitar", you have a lot more certainty about whether this is what you are looking for and regarding its commercial meta-data). c) Use a proprietary hierarchy and convert that into a products and services ontology (details are here: http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/documentation/vocabulary-dev). Pro: Often not a lot of extra effort over b), users have access to the source hierarchy for navigation and search Con: Semantic interoperability between multiple hierarchies remains difficult. d) Using dbPedia entries - as you can see in the following paper, there are many striking arguments for that, in particular the broad coverage (more than 200,000 good categories - 8 times as much as eClassOWL contains). Hepp, Martin; Siorpaes, Katharina; Bachlechner, Daniel: Harvesting Wiki Consensus: Using Wikipedia Entries as Vocabulary for Knowledge Management, IEEE Internet Computing, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 54-65, Sept-Oct 2007. PDF at http://www.heppnetz.de/files/hepp-siorpaes-bachlechner-harvesting%20wikipedia%20w5054.pdf Problems with this approach are that - it is hard to filter out product categories from other dbPedia URIs (on the other hand, we could leave that up to human intelligence at the annotation stage). Also, basically everything that is an object could serve as a product (someone may offer New York city or the Moon for sale - legally problematic, but ontology-wise perfectly correct). - Lack of formal attributes for describing the products in more detail. - Difficult to implement for exports from Web shop software, since most businesses have not yet classified their products in terms of dbPedia URIs. So while ideal for manual descriptions using the GoodRelations Annotator, it is not perfect for bulk data exports. - Mapping to industrial classifications, namely eClassOWL is difficult (same as with c)). But basically we are in perfect agreement and we are already planning to add dbPedia URIs as an alternative approach for describing the type of product or service in more detail. In the meantime, you can already do so manually by editing the RDF/XML file an attaching a link to the dbPedia URI of your choice. foo:myProduct rdf:type gr:ActualProductOrServiceInstance foo:myProduct rdf:type However, one must be careful, because the semantics of the dbPedia URI for types of products is not necessary that of a class of functionally similar objects. dbPedia URIs can be interpreted both with a "topic" semantics or with a narrow "class" semantics. If used as a class, does subsume only actual TV sets or also user's manuals for TV sets? But again - we are working on a model for the proper representation. Best - and thanks for trying and the feedback! Martin Nicolas Raoul wrote: > Hallo Martin, > > I am now browsing Sindice, and I just found this: > Art > and Streetwear > > "Art and Streetwear" is not very understandable for machines, and > that's one of the most important criterion people will search for. > Semantic can bring a lot here. > > So how about letting store owner choose terms from DBpedia ? In the > same way http://faviki.com allows users to tag pages with terms coming > from DBpedia. Maybe a selection of Wikipedia categories could cover > enough to represent all businesses. > > Same goes for: > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">DE > Using > would make it more semantic and more mashupable. > > Is there any reason to have strings instead ? > > vlg > Nicolas. > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Fri May 8 10:04:07 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 10:04:07 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] =?iso-8859-1?q?Bug_in_Prot=E9g=E9_/_Importing_ont?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ologies?= Message-ID: <4A03E777.2010000@ebusiness-unibw.org> Dear all: There seems to be a bug in Prot?g? that may cause irritation when importing GoodRelations (and other ontologies). The effect is that if you try to import GoodRelations into a new OWL project using the official URI "http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1", you will get a Java exception. The reason seems to be that Prot?g? does not explicitly request RDF/XML and then gets XHTML (the documentation). There is an easy fix to that: Simply use the URI of the GoodRelations OWL file, i.e. http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1.owl (mind the .owl suffix!). That will do the trick. The problem is not specific to GoodRelations; we were able to reproduce it with several other ontologies that use content negotiation. Since the latter is a standard technique, I assume the problem is of general relevance. Attached, please find a few screenshots illustrating the problem. Best Martin Hepp -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture 10.png Type: image/png Size: 52606 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture 9.png Type: image/png Size: 78695 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture 8.png Type: image/png Size: 56079 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture 7.png Type: image/png Size: 46460 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture 5.png Type: image/png Size: 78502 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture 4.png Type: image/png Size: 89417 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Wed May 13 12:52:32 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:52:32 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] [Fwd: fw: Google starts supporting RDFa -- 'rich snippets'] Message-ID: <4A0AA670.8090807@ebusiness-unibw.org> Dear all: Great news: Google is now also considering RDFa data! While they are currently supporting only a very limited set of vocabularies, this opens up the chance for GoodRelations data to be honored by Google, too!. Best Martin -------- Original Message -------- Subject: fw: Google starts supporting RDFa -- 'rich snippets' Resent-Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 08:27:30 +0000 Resent-From: public-lod at w3.org Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:27:31 +0200 From: Chris Bizer To: Very nice. After Yahoo SearchMonkey has been around for a while, things are now also moving at Google. See: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/05/introducing-rich-snippets.html And Ivan's comment on it: http://ivan-herman.name/2009/05/13/rdfa-google/ Cheers, Chris -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Wed May 20 10:33:30 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 10:33:30 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] ANN: GoodRelations Service Update 2009-05-05 - Please refresh your caches! Message-ID: <4A13C05A.1020001@ebusiness-unibw.org> Dear all: We just released a service update of the GoodRelations ontology for e-commerce. The ontology is available at http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1 If you want to explicitly fetch the OWL file or the HTML documentation, you may also use http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1.owl or http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1.html Please replace all local copies of GoodRelations by this new file. The service update is designed to be fully backwards-compatible. Only a few changes may require small modifications of current applications or data sets. Those few potentially incompatible changes are as follows: - gr:description is now deprecated; we suggest using rdfs:comment instead. - gr:isListPrice is now deprecated and replaced by the more powerful gr:priceType property. The remaining changes are vocabulary extensions or improvements that help increase the compatibility with Semantic Web applications. For example, we - changed cardinality recommendations for opening hours and business functions, which simplifies the usage of GoodRelations in RDFa; - added PayPal as a payment method, and - added labels to all elements. A complete change log is at http://tinyurl.com/q8yln9 A big thank you for the many valuable suggestions for improvement! Best Martin -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Wed May 20 10:55:39 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 10:55:39 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] ANN: GoodRelations - E-Commerce on the Web of Data - New Datasets and Applications Message-ID: <4A13C58B.7080402@ebusiness-unibw.org> Dear all: Thanks to the help of several partners, there are now new data sets and tools related to the GoodRelations ontology for e-commerce: *1. OpenEAN data set: 1 million EAN/UPC codes plus respective labels* The full data set is at http://openean.kaufkauf.net/id/ Individual commodity descriptions can be retrieved as follows: http://openean.kaufkauf.net/id/EanUpc_ Example: http://openean.kaufkauf.net/id/EanUpc_0001067792600 With this data set, Point-of-Sale applications can simply query the Semantic Web for the proper labels for a given UPC/EAN code. For example, the proper label for the UPC/EAN code 0001067792600 can be retrieved as follows: SELECT ?uri, ?label WHERE {?uri rdf:type . ?uri "0001067792600"^^. ?uri rdfs:label ?label} Since the data set is already replicated in the Virtuoso LOD data space (special thanks to Kingsley Idehen from OpenLink Software!), one can simply query the respective SPARQL endpoint, e.g.: http://lod.openlinksw.com/sparql?default-graph-uri=&query=SELECT+%3Furi%2C+%3Flabel+WHERE+{%3Furi+rdf%3Atype+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fgoodrelations%2Fv1%23ProductOrServiceModel%3E.+%3Furi+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fgoodrelations%2Fv1%23hasEAN_UCC-13%3E+%220001067792600%22^^%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2001%2FXMLSchema%23string%3E.+%3Furi+rdfs%3Alabel+%3Flabel}&format=text%2Fhtml&debug=on&timeout= (alternatively, use http://tinyurl.com/qxwrt6) A big thank you goes to Michael Pfeiffer from Kaufkauf.net (http://www.kaufkauf.net/index.php?l=en) for providing the data and for hosting the RDF data set, and to Andreas Radinger and Tobias Ostheim for the data conversion! * 2. FreeclassOWL: Products and services ontology for the construction and building industry *This ontology defines 4,780 classes, 162 properties, and 1,182 qualitative values for products and services from the construction and building materials domain. All labels are available in up to EIGHT languages. FreeclassOWL is compatible with GoodRelations and available under a Creative Commons 3.0 License. *Base URI: * http://www.freeclass.eu/freeclass_v1 *Ontology: * http://www.freeclass.eu/freeclass_v1.owl *Documentation:* http://www.freeclass.eu/freeclass_v1.html A big thank you goes to Otto Handle from http://www.inndata.at/ for making their Freeclass classification available for the Web of Data, and to Andreas Radinger and Tobias Ostheim for the data conversion! * 3. Extensions / Plug-ins for osCommerce and Joomla/Virtuemart *There are now working prototypes of export interfaces that allow creating GoodRelations data directly from popular Web shop or CMS software. *a) osCommerce Web Shop Software* http://code.google.com/p/goodrelations-for-oscommerce/ (An alternative export project for osCommerce is at http://triplify.org/Configuration/osCommerce.) *b) Joomla/Virtuemart CMS/Shop combo* http://code.google.com/p/goodrelations-for-joomla/ A big thank you goes to Alex Stolz for his hard work in developing the two components! Also, Intershop recently completed an internal feasibility study and prototype of RDFa and RDF/XML export for their Enfinity series. The results are unfortunately not yet available to the general public, but in case you are an Intershop client with Semantic Web interests, it would not hurt to ask them... Best wishes Martin -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Fri May 22 14:59:01 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:59:01 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BFwd=3A_Re=3A_=5BFwd=3A__Bug_in_?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_____Prot=E9g=E9_/_Importing_ontologies=5D=5D?= Message-ID: <4A16A195.7050504@ebusiness-unibw.org> Dear all: When importing GoodRelations in Protege, you must specify the exact file location of the ontology, i.e. http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1.owl Using the ontology base URI http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1 does not work and causes an error message. According to Tania Tudorache, this is not a bug but intended behavior. Best Martin Hepp -------- Original Message ------- This is not a bug. If you import an ontology from a URL, you need to specify the URL of the owl file. So in case of the GoodRelations ontology, you need to specify: http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1.owl And that works fine in Protege 3.4. Tania -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com Sat May 23 11:25:06 2009 From: nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com (Nicolas Raoul) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:25:06 +0900 Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce? Message-ID: Dear all, I want to publish data from Wikitravel.org (like DBpedia does for Wikipedia) so I need an ontology to describe tourism information (hotels, restaurants, spots) with details (address, phone, prices, services, business hours). I was not able to find any, so far. Am I right that currently GoodRelations is only for e-commerce and does not apply to such businesses as hotels, restaurants, and brick-and-mortar shops? I am sure you have surveyed existing commerce ontologies, so I am begging for your expertise: what ontologies exist to describe hotels and restaurants? Thank you very much, Nicolas Raoul http://nrw.free.fr From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Sat May 23 13:46:43 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 13:46:43 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org> Hi Nicholas, Nicolas Raoul wrote: > Dear all, > > I want to publish data from Wikitravel.org (like DBpedia does for > Wikipedia) so I need an ontology to describe tourism information > (hotels, restaurants, spots) with details (address, phone, prices, > services, business hours). I was not able to find any, so far. > > > Am I right that currently GoodRelations is only for e-commerce and > does not apply to such businesses as hotels, restaurants, and > brick-and-mortar shops? > No, GoodRelations can be used (and is intended to be used) for exactly those scenarios: You can use it to express that you - rent cars - sell pizzas (or meals in general) - sell boats For brick-and-mortar-businesses, GoodRelations can be used exactly the same way as for pure online shops. You can specify opening hours, shop locations (e.g. for restaurant chains) etc. For hotels and restaurants: There are specializations based on GoodRelations for the Austrian e-tourism sector available at http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/ restaurants: http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/gastro.owl accommodations: http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/acco.owl But you can basically use either plain GoodRelations or GoodRelations in combination with a suitable hotel or meals ontology for specifying touristic offers. If you have any data samples or, better, real-world data sources, we can help you with the respective modeling. As a first starting point, I recommend looking at gr:BusinessFunctions for Sell and Lease. Best Martin PS: A work-in-progress Web page for the tourism domain is at http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations_Examples#Accommodation_and_Hotel_Rooms > I am sure you have surveyed existing commerce ontologies, so I am > begging for your expertise: what ontologies exist to describe hotels > and restaurants? > > Thank you very much, > Nicolas Raoul > http://nrw.free.fr > > _______________________________________________ > goodrelations mailing list > goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org > http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Sat May 23 15:08:20 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 15:08:20 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce? In-Reply-To: <4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org> References: <4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org> Message-ID: <4A17F544.6000005@ebusiness-unibw.org> Dear Nicolas, all: Of course, you can also use GoodRelations in combination with eClassOWL for describing hotels and restaurants: A good starting point is the tool for creating basic descriptions for any business at http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ The tool only allows choosing from the first two hierarchy levels of eClassOWL, but you could replace the class IDs in the RDF/XML later on in order to make the description more specific. A restaurant could use the eClassOWL 5.1.4 category 2520 (Food and services) or one of the following more specific classes: 25-20-01-00 - Restaurant (service), [ eclass:C_AKG508003-gen ] 25-20-01-01 - Restaurant with conventional service (service), [ eclass:C_AKG509003-gen ] 25-20-01-02 - Restaurant with self-service (service), [ eclass:C_AKG510003-gen ] 25-20-01-03 - Cafe (service), 25-20-01-03 [ eclass:C_AKG511003-gen ] 25-20-02-01 - Bar (service), [ eclass:C_AKG515003-gen ] 25-20-02-02 - Bar and entertainment restaurant (service) [ eclass:C_AKG516003-gen ] 25-20-02-03 - Disco and dance restaurant (service) [ eclass:C_AKG517003-gen ] The proper gr:BusinessFunction would be gr:ProvideService, since eClass classifies restaurants as types of services. (When using an ontology that defines particular types of meals, then the proper business function would be "sell".) A hotel could use the eClassOWL 5.1.4 category 2512 (Travel Management) or, better, one of the following more specific classes: 25-12-13-01 - Hotel (travel management), [ eclass:C_AKG314003-gen ] 25-12-13-02 - Hotel garni (travel management), [ eclass:C_AKG315003-gen ] 25-12-13-03 - Inn (travel management),[ eclass:C_AKG316003-gen ] 25-12-13-04 - Pension (travel management), [ eclass:C_AKG317003-gen ] The proper gr:BusinessFunction would be gr:ProvideService, too. eclass: = http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/ontologies/eclass/5.1.4/# Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > > > > Nicolas Raoul wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I want to publish data from Wikitravel.org (like DBpedia does for >> Wikipedia) so I need an ontology to describe tourism information >> (hotels, restaurants, spots) with details (address, phone, prices, >> services, business hours). I was not able to find any, so far. >> >> Am I right that currently GoodRelations is only for e-commerce and >> does not apply to such businesses as hotels, restaurants, and >> brick-and-mortar shops? >> > No, GoodRelations can be used (and is intended to be used) for exactly > those scenarios: You can use it to express that you > > - rent cars > - sell pizzas (or meals in general) > - sell boats > > For brick-and-mortar-businesses, GoodRelations can be used exactly the > same way as for pure online shops. > > You can specify opening hours, shop locations (e.g. for restaurant > chains) etc. > > For hotels and restaurants: There are specializations based on > GoodRelations for the Austrian e-tourism sector available at > > http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/ > > restaurants: > http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/gastro.owl > accommodations: > http://www.ebsemantics.net/doc/acco.owl > > But you can basically use either plain GoodRelations or GoodRelations > in combination with a suitable hotel or meals ontology for specifying > touristic offers. > > If you have any data samples or, better, real-world data sources, we > can help you with the respective modeling. > > As a first starting point, I recommend looking at gr:BusinessFunctions > for Sell and Lease. > > Best > > Martin > > > PS: A work-in-progress Web page for the tourism domain is at > > http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations_Examples#Accommodation_and_Hotel_Rooms > > > > > >> I am sure you have surveyed existing commerce ontologies, so I am >> begging for your expertise: what ontologies exist to describe hotels >> and restaurants? >> >> Thank you very much, >> Nicolas Raoul >> http://nrw.free.fr >> >> _______________________________________________ >> goodrelations mailing list >> goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org >> http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations >> >> > -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com Sat May 23 17:03:45 2009 From: nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com (Nicolas Raoul) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 00:03:45 +0900 Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce? In-Reply-To: <4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org> References: <4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org> Message-ID: Thank you for your answer! I am glad to know I can use it, I will look into that. >> ?Am I right that currently GoodRelations is only for e-commerce and >> does not apply to such businesses as hotels, restaurants, and >> brick-and-mortar shops? > No, GoodRelations can be used (and is intended to be used) for exactly those > scenarios I am happy but confused. The GoodRelations webpage appears very misleading to me: 1) Motto is "GoodRelations The ontology for E-Commerce" 2) "the representational means required for e-commerce on the Semantic Web" 3) The general term used for businesses/etc is "Web resources" 4) "describing the types of goods and terms and conditions of items and services offered on the Web": it is not obvious that "on the Web" refers to "describing" and not to "offered". The Semantic Web describes the world. The tiny pub near my place will probably never do any e-commerce, but I want to describe it in the Semantic Web. I am glad GoodRelations allows me to do it, but why does it mentions e-commerce everywhere? Cheers, Nicolas. From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Sat May 23 18:41:15 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:41:15 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce? In-Reply-To: References: <4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org> Message-ID: <4A18272B.6070300@ebusiness-unibw.org> Hi Nicolas: As soon as any brick-and-mortar business or pub around the corner is publishing a one-page description of itself on the Web (or even gets listed in a database-driven Web business registry), this business is doing e-commerce. This is the mainstream definition of e-commerce in academia and practice: Using the Internet (or other open digital networks) for any stage in the business transaction - from search to transactions. There are of course different levels of e-commerce, from the the simple presentation of features to end-to-end transaction processing. But as soon as your business publishes its range of products or services on the Web (or even only in the Web of Data), this is e-commerce. And that is exactly what GoodRelations is designed for: improving search and data interoperability for any business that is offering anything on the Web. Hope that clarifies the issue. Best Martin Nicolas Raoul wrote: > Thank you for your answer! > I am glad to know I can use it, I will look into that. > > >>> Am I right that currently GoodRelations is only for e-commerce and >>> does not apply to such businesses as hotels, restaurants, and >>> brick-and-mortar shops? >>> >> No, GoodRelations can be used (and is intended to be used) for exactly those >> scenarios >> > > I am happy but confused. The GoodRelations webpage appears very > misleading to me: > 1) Motto is "GoodRelations The ontology for E-Commerce" > 2) "the representational means required for e-commerce on the Semantic Web" > 3) The general term used for businesses/etc is "Web resources" > 4) "describing the types of goods and terms and conditions of items > and services offered on the Web": it is not obvious that "on the Web" > refers to "describing" and not to "offered". > > The Semantic Web describes the world. The tiny pub near my place will > probably never do any e-commerce, but I want to describe it in the > Semantic Web. I am glad GoodRelations allows me to do it, but why does > it mentions e-commerce everywhere? > > Cheers, > Nicolas. > > _______________________________________________ > goodrelations mailing list > goodrelations at ebusiness-unibw.org > http://ebusiness-unibw.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/goodrelations > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com Sun May 24 14:36:08 2009 From: nicolas.raoul.lists at gmail.com (Nicolas Raoul) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 21:36:08 +0900 Subject: [goodrelations] More than e-commerce? In-Reply-To: <4A18272B.6070300@ebusiness-unibw.org> References: <4A17E223.7040009@ebusiness-unibw.org> <4A18272B.6070300@ebusiness-unibw.org> Message-ID: Hello Martin, > As soon as any brick-and-mortar business or pub around the corner is > publishing a one-page description of itself on the Web (or even gets listed > in a database-driven Web business registry), this business is doing > e-commerce. Thank you for the clarification. According to this definition, all commerces (nearly) do e-commerce. It seems quite different from most definitions I can find at http://www.google.com/search?q=define:e-commerce Let's say my grand-father's grand-father used to sell sausages in 1875 and I want to describe it in RDF in my library, which is not connected to the Internet. Was he doing e-commerce? An ontology for medecine does not call itself an e-medecine ontology. Similarly, an ontology for commerce would probably be better described as a commerce ontology than an e-commerce ontology, in my opinion. I think GoodRelations is a much-needed ontology, I hope it will get adopted by many. I am just afraid that most people reading the main page will assume it is for online businesses: http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations Thanks, Keep up the good work, Nicolas Raoul. From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Mon May 25 12:40:21 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:40:21 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] GoodRelations / EAN/UPC In-Reply-To: <51C090FE-919A-461A-B4AD-6520F4879928@yahoo-inc.com> References: <49C7D1CE.5090206@yahoo-inc.com> <4A140572.2010801@ebusiness-unibw.org> <51C090FE-919A-461A-B4AD-6520F4879928@yahoo-inc.com> Message-ID: <4A1A7595.7030705@ebusiness-unibw.org> (including the mailing list in my reply) Dear Alex: I see the point - the problem with turning gr:hasEAN_UCC-13 into an owl:InverseFunctionalProperty is, as far as I can see, that 1. there is no canonical way of deriving a URI or URN from a given EAN/UCC-13 code. At least, I don't know of any. And unless there is an authoritative URI for each EAN/UCC-code, you can still not avoid custom inferencing. 2. There may be unwanted side-effects (even if rare), because the same gr:ProductModel may have multiple EAN/UCC codes, and, more importantly, EAN/UCC codes can be attached both to gr:ProductModels and gr:Offerings (which is based on how EAN/UPC identifiers are used in the value chain - they can be attached to commodity makes and models and to sales units, e.g. bunles or variants). This is why, for the moment, I favor using custom inferencing to link all records that 1. Are of the same type (e.g. are both gr:ProductOrServices or both gr:Offerings AND 2. Have the same EAN/UCC. Note that two instances x and y whith x being an instance of gr:ProductOrService and y being and instance of gr:Offering MUST NOT be merged into one by owl:sameAs or other axioms, because gr:ProductOrService and gr:Offering are disjoint. Best Martin Alex Cozzi wrote: > Thanks Martin. > A question: the gr:hasEAN_UCC-13 is very useful for unifying objects > across databases, but currently is a datatype property. I was > wondering whether defining a reverse functional property > (owl:InverseFunctionalProperty) that points to a URI version of the > EAN_UCC-13 would be possible/desiderable. I am not sure what is the > standard uri representation of EAN_UCC-13, but having such property > would reduce the amount of custom inference needed to unify product > descriptions. Does it make sense? > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: From martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org Mon May 25 19:34:30 2009 From: martin.hepp at ebusiness-unibw.org (Martin Hepp (UniBW)) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:34:30 +0200 Subject: [goodrelations] GoodRelations entity types hit ranks #3, #20, and #46 in popularity on PingTheSemanticWeb Message-ID: <4A1AD6A6.9030104@ebusiness-unibw.org> Dear all: Since our recent new vocabularies and data sets are now properly included, GoodRelations elements are now among the most popular concepts on the Web of Data according to PingTheSemanticWeb: Rank 3: gr:ProductOrServiceModel Rank 20: gr:BusinessEntity Rank 46: gr:QualitativeValue Only the long established FOAF person and document elements are used more frequently: Rank 1: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person 19, 002, 417 Rank 2: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Document 4, 793, 253 Additional, more powerful datasets are under to be released shortly. Note that there is a lot of room for additional growth. There are actually more than 19 million business entities in Europe alone, which are perfect candidates for gr:BusinessEntity, and they will each likely have anything between a few and several thousand instances of gr:Offering and gr:ProductOrServiceSomeInstacesPlaceholder. Best Martin -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp at computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp Check out the GoodRelations vocabulary for E-Commerce on the Web of Data! ======================================================================== Webcast explaining the Web of Data for E-Commerce: ------------------------------------------------- http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Tool for registering your business: ---------------------------------- http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/goodrelations-annotator/ Overview article on Semantic Universe: ------------------------------------- http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.html Project page and resources for developers: ----------------------------------------- http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Upcoming events: --------------- Full-day tutorial at ESWC 2009: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in One Day: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/tutorials/70 Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1881/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PTSW-Top10-May 25.png Type: image/png Size: 88441 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PTSW-All-May 25.png Type: image/png Size: 193551 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: martin_hepp.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 308 bytes Desc: not available URL: