Dear all:
This question may be relevant for a broader audience:
>
>
I think I don't understand the usage of gr:hasUnitOfMeasurement in a
>
UnitPriceSpecification in general.
>
If somebody is not sure whether the offering is a bundle (or if the
>
UnitPriceSpecification of a product can meaninfully refer to a "unit
>
or piece"),
>
is it wrong to add the property "gr:hasUnitOfMeasurement" with the
>
value "C62"?
>
Would it be better to add this property with C62 or ignore this
>
property completely?
>
>
I only found one example in our wiki where the value of
>
hasUnitOfMeasurement is not C62 at
>
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelationsRental
>
Note that the Unit of Measurement is relevant in two aspects of an offer:
- First, it can be used to specify the quantities of individual
components of a bundle.
- Second, it can be used to indicate the unit to which a price
specification refers.
Example:
For a simple offer, you could say that you offer to sell 200 grams of
salami and that the price was 20 euros per kilogram of salami. Then, the
gr:UnitOfMeasurement attached to the gr:TypeAndQuantityNode is "grams"
(GRM in UN/CEFACT) and the gr:UnitOfMeasurement attached to the
gr:UnitPriceSpecification is "kilogram" (KGM in UN/CEFACT).
As soon as there is more than one component included in the offer, the
only meaningful unit of measurement for the price specification is "C62"
for unit or piece.
Example:
If you offer 200 grams of salami and 1 liter of beer for altogether 8
euros, then you would use "GRM" and "LTR" for the two
gr:TypeAndQuantityNode instances and "C62" for the unit price
specification.
There can be rare cases of bundles that allow other units of measurement
for the price specification, but as a rule of thumb, use C62 as soon as
there is more than one component included the offer.
Relevant exceptions can be found for business functions other than
gr:Sell - e.g. Rental: If you offer to rent out a pair of skis and 2
tons of snow, then the price may be specified per hour (HUR in
UN/CEFACT). But again, those cases are rare (yet still perfectly
supported by GoodRelations).
Best wishes
Martin Hepp
--------------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail:
hepp at ebusiness-unibw.orgphone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:
http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
Project page:
http://purl.org/goodrelations/Resources for developers:
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelationsWebcasts:
Overview -
http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/How-to -
http://vimeo.com/7583816Recipe for Yahoo SearchMonkey:
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations_and_Yahoo_SearchMonkeyTalk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009:
"Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology"
http://www.slideshare.net/mhepp/semantic-webbased-ecommerce-the-goodrelations-ontology-1535287Overview article on Semantic Universe:
http://www.semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-web-based-e-commerce-webmasters-get-ready.htmlTutorial materials:
ISWC 2009 Tutorial: The Web of Data for E-Commerce in Brief: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/Web_of_Data_for_E-Commerce_Tutorial_ISWC2009