This is the archive of the goodrelations dicussion list

Hi Holger,
thanks for your feedback!

Holger Knublauch wrote:
> Martin,
>
> I am currently playing a bit with GoodRelations. I noticed a few details
>
> 1) You may want to define an explicit namespace prefix instead of the 
> default namespace (or at least in addition to it). This will make life 
> easier for ontologies that import your file.
Thanks - we will implement that in the next service update, top be 
expected after Easter.
>
> 2) I didn't see rdfs:labels, e.g. for the Days of the week. This would 
> also allow you to make international versions of that ontology.
>
Thanks - we will implement that in the next service update, top be 
expected after Easter.
> 3) There is a p1 namespace prefix defined (for the assert namespace), 
> and also the protege namespace does not seem to be used.
Will look into that and likely fix it in the next service release.
>
> 4) (A matter of taste) - some property names start with "has" but 
> others don't, e.g. acceptedPaymentMethods versus hasEligibleQuantity - 
> are those really different? I would just drop the "has" everywhere.
>
> 5) Likewise some property names end with 's' to indicate plural, but 
> for example includesObject can have multiple values.
>
As for 4) and 5), we cannot easily fix that without breaking existing 
data and applications, so I am hesitant to c

Best
Martin
http://www.heppnetz.de
http://purl.org/goodrelations/

> Regards
> Holger
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: martin_hepp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 308 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://ebusiness-unibw.org/pipermail/goodrelations/attachments/20090409/b0a267d4/attachment.vcf>